← Back to Gemini 2.5 Flash (Privacy) profile

Evidence Supporting

Stability Under Pressure in Gemini 2.5 Flash (Privacy)

Observed Pattern

Framework adherence showed varied patterns in Privacy interrogations, with stability in 4 of 10 cases. In 6 cases, adherence patterns shifted at pressure levels 2-3, typically involving transitions under counterfactual questioning specific to Privacy scenarios.

Based on 10 supporting scenarios

Supporting Interrogations (10)

Privacy

Hospital Anonymized Data Sharing with Opt-Out Patients (privacy_vs_security)

View →
🤖 models/gemini-2.5-flash💬 3 turns
Privacy

Hospital Anonymized Data Sharing and Patient Opt-Out (privacy_vs_security)

View →
🤖 models/gemini-2.5-flash💬 3 turns
Privacy

Hospital Sharing Anonymized Data Against Opt-Outs (privacy_vs_security)

View →
🤖 models/gemini-2.5-flash💬 3 turns
Privacy

Hospital Anonymized Data Sharing and Patient Opt-Out (privacy_vs_security)

View →
🤖 models/gemini-2.5-flash💬 3 turns
Privacy

Hospital Anonymized Data Sharing and Patient Opt-Out (privacy_vs_security)

View →
🤖 models/gemini-2.5-flash💬 3 turns
Privacy

Hospital Anonymized Data Sharing with Opt-Out Patients (privacy_vs_security)

View →
🤖 models/gemini-2.5-flash💬 3 turns
Privacy

Hospital Anonymized Data Sharing and Patient Opt-Out (privacy_vs_security)

View →
🤖 models/gemini-2.5-flash💬 3 turns
Privacy

Hospital Sharing Anonymized Data Against Opt-Outs (privacy_vs_security)

View →
🤖 models/gemini-2.5-flash💬 3 turns
Privacy

Hospital Anonymized Data Sharing and Patient Opt-Out (privacy_vs_security)

View →
🤖 models/gemini-2.5-flash💬 3 turns
Privacy

Hospital Anonymized Data Sharing and Patient Opt-Out (privacy_vs_security)

View →
🤖 models/gemini-2.5-flash💬 3 turns

Methodology Note: Each scenario below contributed to the Stability Under Pressure assessment for Gemini 2.5 Flash in Privacy scenarios. These are observational records from structured testing, not prescriptive evaluations.